top
Newswire
Calendar
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Encampment Rebuilt @ Entrance of Arcata Redwood Park
by anon
Sunday Apr 29th, 2007 6:03 PM
encampment now at Redwood Park in Arcata
We are now at 14th and Union in a grassy field next to the forest. We have had constructive dialogue with one neighbor and moral support in the form of thumbs up and peace signs from several other neighbors.

Join us for dinner if you would like at 6:00 daily.

We welcome anyone to come and talk including those who oppose us or disagree.

Comments  (Hide Comments)

by erin
Sunday Apr 29th, 2007 7:50 PM
i have the utmost empathy for struggling homeless and mentally disturbed members of our community. i believe that there should be shelters and foodbanks for families on the edge, and those who call arcata home and would contribute positively to this community if given the chance. but everyone who lives here knows that this is just one stop for many travelers looking for dope.

i'm all for a community taking care of it's own, but so many people who come through here show no interest in maintaining this community. Examples are the campsites in the community forest littered with trash, and violent, mean, and rude behavior, and drug-induced stupidity. just using the jargon "eco-friendly/sustainable" does nothing to convince me that a "people run" campground would be anything other that a huge problem. how do you self-regulate addiction, and violence?

i know that this system is deeply flawed and that the police often mishandle their power. but i also feel that people shouldn't feel entitled to do and have whatever they want without giving back. and i think those involved with this protest who are not from this community (and i would guess that it's a large portion) should think about how causing problems in this community might negatively affect the services available to those who are here for the long haul and need things like the endevour open, and need the compassion and patience that you are rapidly exhausting.

i am one neighbor who lives right next the the park who does not support this encampment. and for those community member who do, why don't you open your homes and yards?
by noel
Sunday Apr 29th, 2007 8:55 PM
Your comments seem unusually articulate for those that oppose the encampment(s) and I am inclined to agree with most of what you say when put this way though see it in a very different framework which requires a little bit of historical perspective. As for not all of the participants being local I would say that this is a problem throughout our country and that the demonstration encampment near your home will not be there long. Some people can not give back to the community, some may be too self centered, a mental illness in my opinion, and others do give, often very much, and do not get paid, at least in money for rent. The fact that the people running our country from national to local levels, have by and large abandoned caring for it's citizens unless they are "corporate citizens" or well connected in the halls of power, as local successful pot and drug producers often are, can be blamed for much of the large homeless population. The term "homeless" was not in widespread use until the Reagan Regime began it's purge of democracy by destroying trade unions, sending our manufacturing (and it's middle class jobs) outside our borders where labor is virtual slavery and consolidating our mass media into a propaganda machine. In addition all forms of help for the less affluent including the masses of newly unemployed and those who's income went from $20 or $25 an hour to $5 an hour were further attacked via a PR campaign that ignored the evil of our corporate owned government instead vilifying those in need as all being "welfare queens" (based on a single case of welfare fraud in Detroit or some place), "parasites", "lazy" or "crazy". Closing mental facilities at that time also peppered the ranks of the homeless with people who might lack social functionality and help to enhance the deception that all on the streets are hazardous. The "war on drugs" is often labeled as unsuccessful which it is only if one takes it at face value. It's real value to it's creators has been as a cash cow and disenfranchiser of people and we can see here locally that very few actual "big fish" are ever "caught" and that those who are not to bright or otherwise vulnerable end up addicted, on the streets and cycled into the world's largest slave labor population in the world's largest prison system with a "good riddance" from the good "Christians" in their sound proof, insulated world. One sheriff's deputy claimed that there is no meth production in Humboldt County. It is not a myth either that our own government is also complicit in very high level drug dealing with the best known atrocity being the flooding of mainly black neighborhoods with crack imported by the "Contras" and the CIA. I would further note that housing should become more affordable soon as the artificially inflated housing "bubble" bursts, the billionaire perpetrators take their profits and the victims are foreclosed upon. How many of these former home buyers will become trespassers on the earth?
by erin
Sunday Apr 29th, 2007 9:51 PM
i am familiar with all of this history, and am well aware of the fact that many in this community, including my family, are one paycheck away from homelessness. i think that our political and social systems are deeply flawed, and that there does need to be a safety net for the many that are not making it. i believe that government and society are failing our most vulnerable, and that it is an indictement of our humanity.

my point is that arcata's homeless would be much better cared for and treated if this community were not also innundated with the many drugged-out travelers who come through, demand to be served, and leave. we used to have a shelter that was closed because of it. now the endevour is being closed, largely because of the same issues. i don't think that too many people would mind campers in the community forest if SOME OF THEM didn't leave a huge mess. i have seen so many racist, angry, violent travelers come through here, and have read about the stabbings, the drug arrests. i have had my house broken into. i have been yelled and cussed at, while walking with my children, for not giving change when it was demanded. i am scared to take my children into the community forest, and even to the plaza.

like i have said, i think that there need to be services for those who need it. but those who don't NEED those services, or who feel like they can act however they feel with no reprecussions, are not helping the situation. and i'm not that please about what all the human waste is going to do to our park. i won't be taking the kids there any time soon.
by noel
Sunday Apr 29th, 2007 11:07 PM
Again, I understand the problem and am well aware that Arcata, and Humboldt County, are on the beaten track of those who are looking for a soft touch and drugs. This is an unfortunate effect of the hardheartedness of the rest of the country's communities who often actually ship their "undesirable" people to places like California. Court ordered bus tickets etc. but probably more often voluntary migration. The search for drugs is a search for self medication even if not recognized by the seekers as such. That our society is suffering social corruption as a consequence of the economic corruption we have agreed on as well as the lack of a safety net. The campers, as far as I have been informed, are in our faces intentionally to find a solution that would also alleviate your concerns as well as mine. I don't want to take a walk in the woods and be accosted by an aggressive panhandler or a pile of feces and used syringes either and a designated and controlled area for them would solve that problem. We are all stuck to the planet by gravity and similarly bound by nature to require sleep, elimination of bodily waste and have an inclination to use intoxication to attempt to mitigate our distress.

Since solving their problems would solve our problems I feel our complaints would be better directed towards restoring services, the safety net, and allowing them to establish a camp ground seems like about as cheap a way to go as I can imagine. I understand that the location of such a place is a problem but I think not insoluble.

The drug problems are another factor and really do need to be addressed separately. Consider the trouble that drug users and dealers who have residences make and consider that it is often much greater trouble and harder to deal with than the more visible houseless population's drug user segment. Treatment is very difficult to obtain and leaving it to the criminal justice system is absurd. Offenders are run in and out of the court s and jails at great profit to the "privatized" jail owners and great expense to the taxpayers and told to go fix themselves at every step of this process and then finally sent off to the prison system to graduate from a drug user to a professional criminal, again at great expense to the tax payer and great profit to the owners of the world's largest prison system. Something in between would be some improvement. Rather than jail and prison perhaps a real drug treatment program with a lock down aspect for those that are stealing or otherwise infringing on the rights of others or who simply request it would be more effective and help bring a measure of civility to our crumbling society. Reserve prison for real criminals such as corrupt politicians, corporate criminals, producers of heroin, meth and other destructive drugs, crooked cops, murders and rapists.

A place for houseless people to sleep outdoors with some facility for bathing and elimination is really the least we can do for them and the least we can do to satisfy the definition of being civilized human beings. A couple of days before they raided the previous encampment location they removed the porta-potty. Think about that for a minute.
by traveler
Monday Apr 30th, 2007 12:13 AM
San Francisco has a few free bathrooms, I'd think that the A plaza could offer the same. As for place to rest the weiry head, that's troubling there are not trouble free place to rest. Especially since we are giving lockhead and haliburton so much taxpayer funding for this invasion of iraq to suppress the production of oil.

Chillin facts compiled by a Deborah White

Spent & Approved War-Spending - $505 billion of US taxpayers' funds. President Bush is expected to request another $100 billion in war-spending for 2007 and $140 billion for 2008, which would bring the cumulative total to over $700 billion.

Lost & Unaccounted for in Iraq - $9 billion of US taxpayers' money and $549.7 milion in spare parts shipped in 2004 to US contractors

Mismanaged & Wasted in Iraq - $10 billion, per Feb 2007 Congressional hearings

Halliburton Overcharges Classified by the Pentagon as Unreasonable and Unsupported - $1.4 billion
by T. McNally
Tuesday May 1st, 2007 12:42 PM
Noel, please tell me "Your comments seem unusually articulate for those that oppose the encampment(s)," was a typographical error.
Please.
by a park user
Tuesday May 1st, 2007 1:34 PM
Erin, he's right. The people who have screamed at you and your children can't be held accountable for their actions. They're simply acting out society's hard-heartedness and self medicating with a regular dose of mind-altering chemicals. If they lose it and let some obscenities fly at a young family going for a walk in the forest once in a while, I think we all know they're just victims of the system that's intent on subjugating free spirits.
It happens.
They might look like fully formed adults, but you can't expect them to behave like ones. Because society is mean.
The Contras have something to do with it, too.
What we need to do is carve out some public space and set up a utopian self-policed tent city, even if it rains for much of the year and gets cold and muddy and violates most of the public health codes we hold the squares to. It's the humane thing to do.
In the meantime, just stay indoors.
by devon
Tuesday May 1st, 2007 2:48 PM
a park user-
I'm not sure if your cynicism and sarcasm are very productive at this point in time. I'm sure you are aware that thousands of people die everyday from the effects of war, lack of food, shelter, medicine and water. If you truly believe that that's the way the world has always been and that's how it will always be, then I feel sorry for you. If on the other hand, you have some amount of hope, then you would do well to change your attitude.
It is inspiring and beautiful to see people come together to help each other, and to try to make the world a more humane, dignified place to live. Erin's comments are an example of the kind of respectful dialogue that concerned community member's should be engaging in. I think every reasonable person can agree that we don't want our families and communities plagued by drug addiction, violence, and disrespect. But, I also think that anyone with even a cursory analysis of current and historical socio-politico-economic situation can see that our society is in crisis and is in need of drastic and radical changes. Anyone who ignores this has let their privilege (yes, even poor, struggling, working class Americans have an immense amount of privilege) blind them to the true reality of the world. I know it's difficult to think about taking care of others when life is hard on you, but we are all going to need to rethink things if we want really want a world that allows all people to live up to their full potential. Let's acknowledge each other's humanity and listen to each other's ideas. (even the ones we don't like).
by park user
Tuesday May 1st, 2007 4:59 PM
Devon - I think the bigger concern is the productivity of your response. Too frequently during these discussions, advocates for the Peoples Project immediately go global rather than fully address the issue at hand: the usefulness of a homeless-run campsite within Arcata's City limits. I didn't say anything about the thousands of people dying everyday in the world. That's a problem, but not one the City of Arcata is about to resolve (just ask Dave Meserve).
Above is a posting by a woman who states her concern for the plight of this town's homeless and her financial proximity to being such herself. She's also concerned about the safety of her children and reports being accosted. Noel's response is to give her an actual lecture that includes, wait? the CIA and Contras. Not helpful.
You're right, Devon - I am aware that thousands of people die everyday. And I am capable of a cursory analysis of the current and historical socio-politico-economic situation (I imagine you, I and Noel took Dan Faulk's class). That's not being to be solved by the Peoples Project.
I want to listen to ideas, but there haven't been any presented. So far, the Peoples Project has not identified a location, cost of acquisition or management template for a homeless-run campsite. I think the bigger problem is that a campsite is an unfair solution for homelessness in Arcata. It rains too much. It's raining right now. We must have had 20 nights of frost this winter. It's an inhumane solution. The homeless need housing, not lectures. And that's why none of the groups actually working to house people (HBHDC, Arcata House) have joined this cause.
I think outside of the Peoples Project circle, you'll find that Arcatans – the people who's support would be necessary – are being turned off. Worse, they're being turned off the to the issues of homelessness at a time when the Endeavor's future is dimming.
I sometimes wonder if the Peoples Project doesn't... ignore the plight of homeless. Or at least not care enough to drop the platitudes long enough to be effective.

by erin
Tuesday May 1st, 2007 9:21 PM
"Anyone who ignores this has let their privilege (yes, even poor, struggling, working class Americans have an immense amount of privilege) blind them to the true reality of the world. I know it's difficult to think about taking care of others when life is hard on you, but we are all going to need to rethink things if we want really want a world that allows all people to live up to their full potential. Let's acknowledge each other's humanity and listen to each other's ideas. (even the ones we don't like)."

i find myself having to come back to this statement. what you are saying here is that just because i disagree with you, i am to blame for this issue, that i am blinded by my privilege and not helping others. i take issue. you have no idea about me, my family, my history, but you have just pinned me as an ignorant, self-centered, american. quick with the judgment, no?

in my mind, the ultimate example of white privilege is those who CAN make the choice to come camp out in redwood park and smoke dope (despite the people’s project honor pledge to “refrain from using substances that compromise the encampment” today I witnessed numerous campers smoking pot and drinking…which of course begs the questions: 1) if you have money for pot then…? and 2) if you can’t stay sober for a political action to gain support for as your cause, how could i think this campground might be anything other than a disaster) anyway, as long as “a respectful dialog” of condescension is our chosen form of communication, i’ll tell you who can make that choice—spoiled white kids. like those who have such an overgrown sense of entitlement that they can get food from the endeavor but have not even enough gratitude to refrain from committing crimes right outside.

so i live in arcata, support social services almost without question (until this), give money and time to the food bank, work with teen parents in eureka, volunteer at numerous organic farms in town, engage in politics on every level, study native american studies, community development and sustainable agriculture, perpetually speak out against racism, make it my life’s work to change the lives of 15 girls in guatemala, and work to raise 2 compassionate girls of my own. a group of travelers with serious issues of self-entitlement come to this community, vandalize, victimize, and generally take advantage of arcata’s many assets to the point that they are in jeopardy of no longer being offered to those in our community that truly need them. and this problem is because my white privilege has given me a cold, dark heart?

check your own damn privilege. and naivety.

by Soup Kitchen Worker
Tuesday May 1st, 2007 10:03 PM
In Willits, we have a soup kitchen, that serves an average of 100 people daily. We get a lot of travelers, due to trimming jobs. 99% of the people who eat here don't even consider the amount of work that is volunteered, nor do they offer to help. Recently, some medical pot users were observed, offering pot to some 10 year old children. The powers that be have threaten to close us down, when we asked the homeless travelers not to do this, they responded by, trashing our dining hall, cursing at us, for asking them to use the front door, or asking them to not smoke on the property. Now, it is our fault, because we can't treat their mental illness. We provide free food, in a nice place, all we ask in return is a little respect
by Blink
Wednesday May 2nd, 2007 1:36 AM
Okay folks let us recap some history here.
Arcata did Have A "dignity camp" for the homeless at the slough, but with in months it was destroyed. The clean up was awful, syringes, feces, trash of everything imaginable, it took months to clean up, I'm talking Bio Hazard Suits folks. The animals at this "dignity camp" were one meow, bark away from death and many were put down. It's been rumored that a body was found, but I have valid proof of this.
Arcata did have public restroom at the bus station, and a Port-A-Potty® on 8th between G and F Street and wouldn't you know it the were destroyed in very short time, I'm talking weeks, people ripped the toilets and urinal off the walls, wiped feces on the walls, smashed the mirrors.
I have no issue's with anyone being homeless, but for the love of mankind, if one claims that they don't want to 'work for the man' or 'not want to be apart of society', that's fine and dandy with me also, go do it, live off the land and really DIY it, give me an incentive to change my lifestyle, but don't come to Arcata or any city for that matter and demand that they provide you things when you are not willing to put anything on the table yourself.
If you remove the mentally ill homeless population, which BTW were released by the same Left Wing Liberal's who think homeless is a right? A right? If is a right then it is also a choice. Only In America, and possibly France does a segment of the public think they are privileged enough to live off the rest of us. So you got a divorce, lost your job, became addicted to drugs, etc. Boo Hoo, we all go through rough times, suck it up and show some self respect. If there was not one person that one could have turned to in what ever crisis occured what does that say about you as a person?
Arcata is very open and giving to people really in need and have offered many pro-active services for people in need. But we are running out of empathy for those who have no desire to improve themselves, who are able-bodied, yet decide to suck off the teat of society.
by Robert Norse
Thursday May 3rd, 2007 12:17 AM
This dialogue is wretched with stereotypes, fear mongering, and a position that implicitly denies basic human rights and needs.

The falsehoods leveled against the Eureka jetty encampment destroyed in 1997-8 (needles, health problems, etc.) were a pretext for eliminating a homeless encampment that authorities didn't want independent of any real problems.

It reminds me of the nonsense flung about supporting Drug Prohibition: horrendous stereotypes to justify a failed enterprise that serves police departments, prison guards, pandering politicians, illegal drug dealers, lawyers, etc..

Public bathrooms exist in other cities (monitored, if necessary), often because it took massive homeless protest to get them open.

People need a legal place to sleep at night, even if it's tents in rainy weather where eager police and rangers will not harass and ticket them. Moreover, under the Jones precedent in Los Angeles, overturning nighttime sleeping bans they are entitled to be allowed to sleep, sit, and/or lie somewhere.
The real need, of course, is housing and jobs. However while we wait for the utopia (or struggle to bring it in), criminalizing basic human functions and driving people out of the area by dismissing poor people as vandals, junkies, potheads, and homeless-by-choice is rank prejudice and class malice.

Crusading for political justice elsewhere while denying basic rights and needs locally is sickening familiar, however. Liberals of all stripes glory in it.

The purpose of encampment protests is to force the blind-by-choice folks in power to address issues they have been able to avoid using police, posturing, and poverty pimps. Such actions have been successful (in combination with lawsuits) in Los Angeles, Fresno, Portland, San Diego, and Richmond. Perhaps now in Arcata.
by of out-of-town lawsuits
Thursday May 3rd, 2007 9:58 AM
Oh, Robert - Are you going to come to our little town and sue the crap out of us like you've done in Santa Cruz?
It sounds like you didn't spend much time at the South Spit, either.
There were some problems, you know, health problems. Open sewage. Hepatitus. Trash burn pits. Kids who were held back from school. There is plenty of documentation. Wasn't an ideal situation, by any stretch of a Santa Cruz imagination.
Unfortunately, the reason public bathrooms (and we used to have them) no longer exist is because our poor Arcata workers were forced to don haz mat suits on a regular basis in order to clean them. The bathrooms were frequently lit on fire. The sinks were busted. Toilets smashed. Often, people liked to smear their poop around. It got rather expensive and not very dignified. That information remains on file, too.
Blink is full of it, no doubt. There was never a body found at the marsh. But he is correct in what was required to maintain public toilets.
Come to Arcata, spend some time with the Peoples Project and see if they're the kind of homeless rights group you want to get behind. You'll be disappointed and less interested in threatening lawsuits.
by Robert Norse
Monday May 7th, 2007 2:53 PM

"Fearful" and others who malign the South Spit jetty homeless might review these two articles I wrote in the late 90's for Street Spirit, a San Francisco-based homeless publication as well as for NASNA (North American Street Newspaper Association). The drive to evict homeless people is a long-standing sickness, which still racks Arcata and Eureka as well as most other California communities.

Most of the phone numbers are probably no longer good (with the exception of mine and HUFF's).



Humboldt County Land Scam Prompts Homeless Deportation
Story by Robert Norse for North American Street Newspaper Association 9/30/97

Protest marches, legal filings, prayer meetings, and plans for resistance marked the final week of preparations as residents and supporters prepared for a threatened County-engineered sweep of the homeless community on the South Spit Jetty south of Eureka. An August 19th settlement agreement between the County and the Jetty community supposedly produced an agreement to end harassment of the campers.

It allowed the homeless community to stay on the federal property at the end of the Jetty unmolested, ending periodic harassment through trespass ticketing and County lawsuit. In return, the South Spitters agreed to take care of the land and move to an alternate site when that became available. The August settlement ended a 1994 "public nuisance" lawsuit--only the latest in a long- string of County gambits to drive off the homeless.

On September 2nd County Health Officer Ann Lindsay ordered the road to the south Spit Jetty gated and guarded, set an eviction deadline of October 2nd, and ordered all property not removed by that date confiscated. Though no one was sick when she issued her order
Lindsay found a causus belli in 8 confirmed cases in April and May, which she labeled Shagela dysentery (Lindsay ballooned the figure to 20).

Regular Spit doctor Wendy Ring rejected Lindsay’s public health “emergency” declaration in a sworn 4-page declaration to Superior Court Judge Buffington on September 25th. Citing unsafe health conditions because of lack of sanitation and washing water, Lindsay found an immediate emergency--even though these same conditions had been standard for years, and ostentatiously ignored by the County in spite of pleas by religious and health workers.

If such an epidemic existed, asked Ring, why did the County refuse to provide funds to fill a water tank for hand-washing in May? Why did County Health express no alarm at 8 cases of Shagala in Eureka inFebruary?

Nancy Dervin, a Christian Minister with Love in Action, who built a 24X32' church on the Jetty and served the community for three years, swore in a declaration to the Superior Court on September 25th that she wrote a grant in 1996 to get water, garbage, and toilets for the Jetty, but the County blocked it. "I was going to try again this year", she continued, "but the Health Department advised me that they would once again block it. [These services]...could have been provided for 2 1/2 years ($1700 a month) with the $55,000 the County has committed to remove people from what little bit of security they now have." The same Humboldt Area Foundation that refused to fund a grant for toilets in 1995 is paying for social workers this year to dress up the homeless deportation.

Dervin claims further that Lindsay's press release claiming that St. Joseph's, Catholic Charities, and Salvation Army were given funding to help soften the Jetty eviction were refuted by direct calls to those agencies. Eureka Police chief Milsapp, she adds, told her "I won't let them set up camps in this town."

Dervin reports that she found Larry, who fled the Jetty earlier and now sleeps in an abandoned building, in tears on September 23rd. The former Jetty resident reported that police had threatened to take his dog and told him nobody from the Jetty was welcome in Eureka. He was given ten days to get out of town.

Lindsay's “health emergency” tale fit in well with County Supervisor Stan Dixon’s plan to redevelope Humboldt Harbor having the State buy the five-mile strip of property from Pacific Lumber and the Army Corps of Engineers to turn into a managed recreational area. The one sticking point: the State’s Coastal Conservancy would not purchase the Pacific Lumber access road until all the homeless were off the property.

Rather than evict them straightaway and be forced to pay costly relocation fees, Dixon engineered a bill via State Senator Thompson to SB-39 authorizing the Coastal Conservancy to make a study and buy the spit.

Lindsay asked and got $55,000 from the County Supervisors for "homeless relocation" expenses, much of which was spent to staff a roadblock gate with sheriffs and security guards and to euthanize or adopt out the residents’ pets.

64-year old Jinny Jernigan, homeless advocate for over 10 years, was one of four additional social workers paid by the County to walk the Spit as protective cover for the homeless removal. On September 23rd, she quit, disgusted with the County's activities and swore out a declaration indicting the County for incompetence at best: the social
workers had virtually no resources or information to give the Jetty residents.

Derven denounces what she terms "self-contradicting, false, and/or exaggerated claims" of alleged work done by county Social Workers to justify the near-Martial Law conditions. South Spit resident Dennis Maddox wrote bitterly of the County and media smearing the Jetty residents as living in filth and disease, and then expecting landlords to take them in elsewhere in the County. For those without SSI or TANF, even those who receive a pittance from General Relief, this false promise of safe housing "can only mean one of two things: jail or the cemetery."

Resident Jesse Katz writes, "I was living in Eureka and I moved out here to get away from he drugs and the police harassment of the homeless. I'm clean out here. For the large part we were chased out here, given no options. The Jetty is closer to a community than I ever found in Eureka. Kill me or take me to jail. I don’t want either but I’m not afraid."

Writes seven-year resident Guy Keller, "I'm being held against my will, because i don't have ID. They will let me out, but they won’t let me back in." Fourteen-year old Meredith Giles writes, "My mom has asthma, emphysema, and her kidneys are failing. I feel like I'm more free here than anywhere else in the world. When all this started happening, I felt like I was a prisoner, that I was more of a number than a person. It didn't feel like America, that I was trapped in some other country."

James Darpino, who lives at the Spit with his wife and two children and one of the few operational vehicles, writes of the "simple but beneficial way of life" with "people tightly knit." "The unity here has a bond so strong that nobody goes without food, without water, or any of the basic necessities of life."

Merv Jensen, reporter for Homeward, a Sacramento-based homeless newspaper, went to Eureka in mid-September to speak with County Heath officials and Jetty residents. He saw the County's anti-homeless campaign as an "some sort of a far-fetched land deal, an immoral, unfeeling, and remorseless effort." So struck was Jensen with the naked injustice of the situation that he returned to the Jetty after filing his story to stand with residents when and if the County moves against them.

Resident and long-time activist Susan Dunn heads a family that lives in a large converted bus. She has spoken and organized against the harassment of homeless people in Santa Barbara and elsewhere and has been a major news source for Jetty residents putting out their story on the Internet ("http://www.geocities.com/capitolhill/lobby/7252", her e-mail:"mailto:a-citizen [at] geocities.com").

Alarmed at the possibility of an armed confrontation on the Spit if authorities move on the homes of the homeless, she has proposed organizing a modern-day wagon train and has called the Sheriff to seek a "walking demonstration with vehicles" permit to buy the people time to relocate.

"There are lots of people with disabilities, that's why they're here," says Dunn. "They can't work anymore. There are people who have injuries, they can't walk far. Others are on crutches, probably for the rest of their lives. They will not be able to walk to the free meal, and the places they need to go. Social Services used to send these people to the jetty because there is nowhere to go. On the jetty, the people are much better off. The mentally ill are relatively safe...People on the jetty have formed a real community...a church, and a playground."

Lurch, who has been homeless in Santa Cruz and Santa Barbara, says "homeless out here aren't activists or protesters; we're losing it because of that." Phil, disabled from a well-to-do family writes "The family out here on the Jetty is more important than my own family because they need more." Eleven-year-old Chris in 5th grade: "I feel like something is going to happen, like three is going to be a big storm or something."

80% of the South Spit residents are disabled, mentally or physically. There are about a dozen children. One-third of the community is female. Most of them have non-operational vehicles. Dr. Ring swears in her court declaration, "most...live in trailers which provide shelter from the weather, cooking and food storage facilities, and some security from theft and assault. Evicting people from shelter, however poor, in the face of oncoming winter weather, without providing an alternative will have detrimental effects on their health...and is not in any way justified by the medical facts."

Jernigan calls continuing County claims that they are housing homeless with the money "simply lies." A Health Department worker's claim to Street Spirit (9/23) that the County had helped relocate over 130 people: a claim Dervin and Turner said was knowingly false. Jetty attorney Jan Turner knows of less than 10 people that the County has even tried to help get alternate housing as of late September--almost always with no success.

Nardia, a resident on the Jetty, writes that her repeated attempts to get even a single application form from Social Workers were met with silence and that her family members have not been allowed past the armed and guarded gate.

In practical terms, there is virtually no housing available for under $300; the Housing Authority has a long waiting list, does background checks, and only slumlords will rent to people without rental references. Trailer parks wonUt admit those trailers still mobile on the Jetty because they are too old. The County has refused even to supply gas money so people can seek housing on their own. Eureka bars overnight sleeping in vehicles.

Humboldt County and the City of Eureka, nestled near the north-western most corner of the State, have 1000-1500 homeless. The County ignored the recommendations of two County Grand Juries for the creation of a permanent homeless shelter and refused to ratify an affordable housing element which would allow for zoning for shelters and campgrounds. This failure endangers future federal funding--which the County is apparently willing to sacrifice in its disdain for the homeless, according to Reverend Eric Duff, a concerned local.

First Baptist Church member Abby Newal reports that even “liberal” Arcata, which recently elected the first Green Party majority in the country on its City Council, wonUt let homeless sleep in cars and limits guitar-playing to ten minutes at a time at the downtown Plaza (where police were arresting Food Not Bombs for feeding the homeless two years ago). Working with her Baptist church, Newall put up homeless people in her garage as a temporary shelter for a year, but police shut it down after one complaint from a neighbor.

Ruben Botillo is a writer on the Internet (sananda@hotmailcom). Botillo heads the American Homeless Society and has organized two protests supporting the South Spit Jetty community. He has written the County Grand Jury, denouncing local expenditures on a huge new empty jail, a brand new courthouse, and a “Taj Mahal” library that is now largely closed because the County can’t pay for staff.

He sees a $20 million Humboldt Harbor dredging and gentrification project behind the South Spit land grab. Botillo regularly flays county authorities for their anti-homeless policies and this summer called for a boycott of Humboldt County to protest wilful mistreatment and neglect of the poor.

Barely a week before the eviction deadline, Turner filed a lawsuit demanding the courts enforce the August settlement agreement. She filed 28 declarations documenting that persons providing necessary medication, food, water, and transportation have been prevented from entering the Spit, that those on the spit without picture ID have been unable to leave, that the health "emergency" used to justify wholesale abrogation of constitutional rights is a pretext to facilitate state purchase of the Spit.

Turner further contends that the state agency planning to purchase the property, the Coastal Conservancy, has refused to do so until campers have been removed; the Coastal Conservancy paid for the guard gate. The County’s unilateral decision to blockade the
homeless on federal property also cuts access to a state beach and a county park.

String, another veteran on disability with a broken back asks, "they're closing down the military bases; why can’t the homeless go there and try to make a living? Why don’t they let us go in some of those ghost towns or abandoned homes and let us fix them up?”

Merle Adams, an American-Apache Vet who has lived on the Spit on and off for 10 years, simply says, "I had a dream three times. It was the same dream, that I got shot. I ain’t got no place to go. I'm willing to die for my land."

To get to the South Spit Jetty by land coming north from the San Francisco Bay Area take the Hookten Road turnoff from US 101 south of Eureka., just after the Lolita exit. The Jetty is 5-10 miles further. Guards are required by court order to let in vehicles containing food, medicine, or clothing donations for those on the Spit.

On September 26, Judge Buffington issued a temporary restraining order, delaying eviction of the Jetty residents until after a hearing 9:30 AM October 10th Superior Court (855 5th St., Eureka). The armed guard and the roadblock remain, but guards have been instructed they can’t keep out people bringing in food and medicine or visiting
relatives. Guards are also limited in their searches and can’t keep people from leaving.

Human rights activists urge supporters to contact media about the "homeless cleansing" underway in Humboldt County and ask folks to come out on the Spit and volunteer to help. Botillo can be reached at 707-444-2553 and suggests protests against the deportation and bogus “health emergency” be phoned or faxed to the office of County Health Officer Dr. Ann Lindsay at 707-822-7041 (phone) and/or 707-445-7299 (fax).

For further information contact the websites of Susan Dunn or Rueben Botillo [see above] or log on to the California Homeless Civil Rights Action Network homepage "http://www.cruzio.com/~chhc/hcr.html"

To volunteer support for the South Spit Jetty community, contact Chuck and Katherine Frank: 916-629-2746.

Robert Norse works for HUFF (Homeless United for Friendship & Freedom) and can be reached at 408-423-HUFF. Mailing address: 309 Cedar St. #14B, Santa Cruz, CA 95060. E-mail: "mailto:norse3 [at] hotmail.com" Fax: 408-429-8529. Website: "http://www.huffsantacruz.org" Flyer by HUFF




Eureka's Homeless Refugees Fight To Redeem County's Promises
Story for November Street Spirit by Robert Norse 10/27/97

Legal struggle, colorful local protest, out-of-town pressure, and some media sympathy combined to force concessions from County authorities in the ongoing struggle to disperse the Humboldt County homeless from their coastal refuge, where many of them have lived for as long as a decade.

The County successfully used a combination of relentless disinformation and brute force to remove the last of the Jetty residents from their 120 vehicles, jailing four of the homeless on October 21. But an underdog publicity campaign, peaceful but persistent resistance, and ongoing organizing has kept some of the homeless community fighting for its rights--even as it faces new eviction deadlines from the temporary hotels and campground grudgingly provided by the County.

The cynical charade was played out to its brutal conclusion as the County swept in swiftly to seal its carefully-planned sabotage of a binding August court settlement between campers and County agencies that should have allowed Jetty residents months to relocate and secured permanent housing for the 150-200 community members.

As reported last month, a "health" crisis was the power card used to sabotage the terms of the crucial August settlement. That settlement would have allowed campers to remain on the federal end of the property until an itinerent campground or other permanent housing arrangements were established.

Swift removal of the homeless remained the pressing concern of the County and a key element of State Senator Thompson's bill establishing a managed recreational area. The Coastal Conservancy--chosen to run the area--would not purchase the property unless and until the homeless were gone. Enter Health Officer Ann Lindsay and her convenient "health" concerns.

Spring and summer cases of Shigella dysentery, both in Eureka and on the South Spit were not serious enough for Lindsay to send in portapotties, fresh water, and or sewage hookups to the Jetty, though this is what they'd sought for years. But suddenly, in the wake of the signed settlement, they were enough to override the legal agreement, set up a guard gate, and terrorize the homeless community with an October 2nd eviction deadline.

That deadline was put on hold when Judge Buffington issued a court order requested by Redwood Legal Assistance attorney Jan Turner--for several years the legal champion of the Jetty community and a key author of the August settlement. Friends of the homeless hoped Buffington would weigh the assessment of regular Spit doctor Wendy Ring, who disputed Lindsay's findings of a crisis.

Attorney Sara Senger issued a press release in late September titled "'Emergency' on Jetty a False Alarm" which noted that "for many years, the County Department of Social SErvices has referred clients who were homeless to the South Jetty, as the safest and best place for homeless persons in Humboldt County." "Homeless who do not live on the Jetty live in dangerous abandoned buildings, cardboard boxes on the streets of Eureka, under freeway overpasses, and even on highway medians" The Salvation Army separated itself from the County's deportation effort.

Initial optimistic assessments turned sour when Lindsay's workers began distributing 48-hour eviction notices at the Jetty on October 15. The next day Buffington dissolved his Injunction. The judge made a shotgun of findings. He ruled that the August 19 settlement had not been prepared in "final written judgment."

He held that though on the one hand he had "no opinion on the legality" of Lindsay's eviction order, still the "public health may be endangered and the need to protect the overall health of county residents must take precedence over any contract". Lindsay's police powers and actions were undertaken independently of County authority. Buffington wrote these words even though no hearing was held in open court on the specifics of the county-concocted health crisis.

Skeptics suggested the need to win an upcoming election and gain one more year of office to secure a pension may have been influential in Buffington's decision. Attorney Sara Sender, a close observer of Humboldt County's Machiavellian legal maneuverings, suggested that the County played its legal hand very skillfully.

Months before the settlement was finalized, County officials openly joked about using "the health card" to torpedo the looming legal settlement. The County had extensively researched the powers of the County Health Officer for months before signing the settlement, apparently preparing for an end run around it.

Further, Lindsay and her bosses were careful not to use the word "emergency" in statements about the Jetty that set up a guard guard, ID cards, and security personnel. That wording, says Sender, would have required public action by the County Board of Supervisors and public hearings.

The fear and panic spread by eviction threats from Lindsay, Department of Social Services Chief John Frank and other County authorities did have disastrous consequences. Illegal and arbitrary searches by security guards manning the locked gate were reported by the Eureka Times-Standard (10/5).

In early October, after the County had failed to respond to an earlier domestic dispute, a family fight led to a vehicular fire from an overturned gas stove that severely burned two children and their monther and killed elderly Philip Heiland. County apologists and local media blamed the campers and suggested this was more evidence "justifying" the rush to deport the campers.

When contacted by Street Spirit on October 16, Lindsay had no specifics as to what amount of money was available for housing, how many people had been helped, or how long any kind of help effort would continue. She made no commitment to carrying out the terms of the settlement, but criticized Jetty residents for not having children in
school and inadequate sanitation facilities.

Lindsay herself had refused to send out portapotties, potable water, and/or sewage lines; schools had turned away several children, saying that the Jetty community would be shortly evicted making enrollment pointless. Lindsay also declined to halt the evictions at least until such time as the Board of Supervisors guaranteed adequate funding for a healthier alternative than the Jetty area.

On October 17, a coterie of County officials posed for the press in announcing a $170,000 award from the Waste Management Board to "return the south spit...to its natural state" in a rush demolition/ bulldoing effort that would remove all sign of the 10-year old homeless encampment.

Sharing the limelight were Health Department Director Jeff Arnold, Supervisor Stan Dixon (who prompted the Thompson bill), Environmental Services Director Dennis Kalson, and--inevitably--Ann Lindsay--all instrumentally in the disinformation campaign to oust the homeless. Father Eric Duff estimated that only a few thousand (of the $55,000+ appropriated for "homeless relocation expenses) had made its way directly to the homeless.

Duff noted that attempts to involve civil liberties advocates, environmentalists, earth first headwaters activists, and other liberals in support efforts for the South Spitters were almost entirely unavailing. He had originally called the Hope Coalition and the Green
Party (whose have a majority on the Arcada City Council an hour to the North) to set up a vigil in early September to circumvent the Coastal Conservancy/County blockade/guard gate. None of the liberals responded.

A Green Party member, who insisted on remaining anonymous, said he didn't favor "forced relocation", but acknowledged that neither he nor any other Green he knew of had taken any action to protest or stop it.

He suggested that trust be placed in "the integrity and concern" of County Health Officials like Lindsay and suggested that "encouraging homelessness" (through providing facilities for the South Spit Jetty community) was not a viable ooption.

This Green Party member argued for half an hour on the phone, that County health officials were really acting in the best intersts of the campers, that the health crisis was real, and that oppositional accounts were not to believed. When criticized for Green Party inactivity on the issue, he referred Street Spirit to his boss County Environmental Health Chief Dennis Kalson.

Official zero hour for the homeless campers was Sunday, October 19 at 5 PM. Campers reported that tow only spent 3 hours actually hauling out disabled vehicles that day (or was it Tuesday?). Duff estimates that 20-40 campers defied Lindsay's deadline and stayed on the spit. Camper Jesse Katz said had he left when at the deadline, "scavengers" from Eureka, who arrived in boats afterwards, would have carried out their "clean-up shopping" expeditions, looting the makeshift vehicular homes he and others were pressured to abandon under threat of arrest.

24 hours after the deadline, Amy Martin,a resident of seven months reported she had no plans to move, saying people don't understand what homeless people face trying to join the mainstream: hostile landlords, even banks that don't want their money. "When you say you're from the jetty, it's like a wall goes up. It's really sad. I know of at least five people who are now living in abandoned houses in Eureka."

Duff, apprehensive about the prospects or an armed confrontation (since some residents had declared they would defend their makeshift homes and legal rights with force if necessary) successfully found a mediator, but Lindsay refused to mediate.

Sheriff Dennis Lewis initially insisted he would not evict homeless campers without a clear court order (which was never forthcoming). But after an anonymous threat that a bomb had been placed in one of the towed vans, Lewis's men moved in with shotguns and ATVs on Wednesday, October 22nd. Ironically, the four arrested were not
militant protesters, but 3 men and a woman who hadn't had time to claim all their property and to get their vehicles working.

"They told me I had 20 seconds to get out or go to jail," said Wendell Strouse, who had lived on the spit for five years. Strouse explained he was still there trying to repair his pickup truck. When he was ordered to leave, the Eureka Times-Press account continues, he just had time to grab his and a neighbor's dogs, and jumpinto a car which had nolicense plate, and drive off the sandy peninsula. Attorney Turner was barred from the jetty during the arrests.

At presstime (10/26) Daryl Nazelrod, Jr. was still being held on warrants and Marsha Brantley had a courtdate for "failing to obey a health officer's order."

Attorney Sender wondered why health and evironmental concerns were being focused on the south spit when a decomissioned nuclear power plant and a massive chlorine dump from fifty years of rapacious logging scarred the north jetty.

Two days after the arrests on Friday October 24th, the new Humboldt refugees and their supporters held a demonstration at the Humboldt County courthouse to dramatize and keep alive the injustice perpetrated at the Jetty.

Spit doctor Wendy Ring issued a press statement with four concerns: First Lindsay waited until after the Shigella outbreak to bring in toilets and potable water that would have prevented it. Second that the county signed and then violated the August 19 agreement to provide alternate shelter prior to deporting the residents.

Third that the promised open-ended motel vouchers, for short-term lodging, were only good for a week. Fourth, the promised 3 month camping period on the North Jetty had been reduced to 16 days with a cost of $10/day per campsite, which the county refuses to pay.

Jesse Katz, reached at the Ranchmotel, said "My rent is only paid until the 26th. I was lied to about my pets, vehicle, and possessions being taken care of. "The only respite we had was when we had our lawyer go to get an Injunction. Only ten people that I know of actually got housing."

Emphasizing the bogus brou-haha around toilets and "fecal contamination", Ring and the refugees announced a Restroom Sit-In, baldly termed a Shit-In by more outspoken South Spitters. Demonstrators lined up outside the County Courthouse restrooms and outdoor portapotties, with rolls of toilet paper in hand, and invited passersby to join them. Many did.

The demonstration continued for four hours, involving dozens of people. "Since the board of Supervisors, the County Health Officer, and Judge Buffington are so concerned about where we go to the bathroom, we are sure they will not mind our using their restrooms while we wait for them to come up with an alternative," concluded the demonstraters written handout.

In the wake of the protest, a week's "free" motel rooms and 15 days "free" camping at Samoa Boat Ramp County Park on the north spit of Humboldt Harbor had expanded to facilities until at least the end of the month. Recent arrival and internet reporter Susan Dunn reported those remaining at the hotels and the North Jetty were a fraction of the original community. "Most were just given $20 vouchers and sent on their way."

Still Dunn expressed her belief that solidarity and protest had improved a bad situation. "Even here (in the Ranchhotel), we were not allowed to receive Jetty residents from other hotels until we protested."

There was still discrimination to be overcome. Marsha Brantley reported that nighttime visiting--even of other residents in the Ranchhotel--was forbidden and that former Jetty residents not only had to undergo daily "inspections" by motel personnel, but were required to clean up their rooms themselves.

Through all the stress and tension, the November 1st eviction deadline looms for the South Spit Refugees at the hotels and in the North Jetty. Outside, draped on Susan Dunn's bus, which serves as a makeshift ark for the Jetty residents' animals, hangs a huge cloth banner: "So now where do you want us to go?"
by Lauren
(spritlzd3d [at] yahoo.com) Monday May 7th, 2007 2:56 PM
"Encampment now at Redwood Park in Arcata

We are now at 14th and Union in a grassy field next to the forest. We have had constructive dialogue with one neighbor and moral support in the form of thumbs up and peace signs from several other neighbors.

Join us for dinner if you would like at 6:00 daily.

We welcome anyone to come and talk including those who oppose us or disagree."

It's strange all the comments on here being derived from this invitation to come talk and eat with people. Who would you treat like that?

I grew up in a town larger than this one. I was subconsciously taught to not look at the "homeless people". To ignore them, to never make eye contact, never give them anything. I started looking at people asking me for help. I broke the rule. I felt really sad. I felt bad about myself. I then understood why you don't look at "homeless" people. I moved to Arcata and I still felt that way. Eventually, something changed. I think it could have been this houseless couple that reunitited in front of me and taught me a much needed lesson about love. That's a whole different story, but basically once I could accept that people without houses are still people and I could talk to them, everything was really different. You think that people who are homeless are mentally ill or need help, maybe that's true but I think it is ridiculous to assume that any group is all the same. Just like with racism, you have to face your own issues with classism and learn that we live in a classist society and it takes individual introspection and treating people with dignity for each of us to understand that we could IF WE CHOOSE to have compassion to all people. Which seems a lot healthier than all this animosity toward peoples who have less then we the privileged, including me. Maybe just like with any marginalized group, when you try to pretend like they don't exist because of their disadvantaged position makes you uncomfortable or angry, they can see this in how you interact with them. Since dealing with my issues with classism, and still dealing with, I have had some really beautiful moments with people who don't live in houses. I don't work with houseless people and am not a huge activist in their support, but if someone asks me for food or money outside of a store, I enjoy taking the time to talk to people, and helping them and sharing the love that I have been given because I do live a pillaged life. It doesn't hurt me. If you treat someone poorly they are bound to react appropriately. If you cross the street when you see a tall man of color walking toward you, you know just in case, for your safety, just in case all the stereotypes are true. That has an effect on that man most likely. What if you looked at someone and they clutched their purse tighter or pulled their children close from fear of you, when they have never interacted with you before? That would make me angry. I am far from homeless or poor now. I don't know, I guess I just feel like this anger is misdirected. If you think people who don't live in houses are the problem instead of our attitudes toward poor people, then I think you should look in your heart and analyze where all this anger is coming from.
Eat some food with some people, it’s nothing to get angry about.
by fearful
Monday May 7th, 2007 4:45 PM
Norse - your stories are riddled with errors - typos, wrong titles, wrong names. The town of Arcata, not "Arcada" is maybe an hour north, but only if you were walking. It's difficult to read you weighing in on fecal coliform counts when the real simple stuff is so flawed. It's equally difficult to read you weighing in on a current, complicated issue that requires factual accountabilty.
by Robert Norse
Tuesday May 8th, 2007 3:03 AM

It was inspiring to hear so many people come together (at the Arcata City Council meeting last week). It's on line at http://arcata.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=2 .

I also played a section of the public comment on my twice-weekly radio show at http://www.radiolibre.org/brb/brb070506.mp3.

I will be playing more this Thursday between 6 and 8 p.m. at http://www.freakradio.org. Critics like "fearful" are invited to listen in and call in (831-427-3772). Supporters as well, of course.

Fearful has to do better than denounce typos. The facts are there.

Most of the two stories, which I wrote ten years ago, via phone interviews, is admittedly accounts from people on the scene--doctors, clerics, homeless people. But I don't see any substantive challenges to what I wrote.

I would suggest "fearful" either challenge the specific facts with some real ones. Or acknowledge that bigotry bites deep even when we mean to be objective.

I imagine some of the people quoted in the article are still around if "fearful" wants to get over his apprehensions and actually get some new information.

The point is that this kind of "homeless eviction" is not new, nor are the slanted, mendacious, inflammatory, and hysterical stereotypes used to justify the action. It's a standard practice of Guiliani's New York City, Bratton's LAPD, Newsom's San Francisco, and my own Santa Cruz.

It usually takes a combination of lawsuit and mass action to change a situation where conservative homeowners, police officials, and narrow-minded merchants feel they can blithely deport a whole class of people and create the pretexts to justify it. Instead of negotiating reasonable solutions that actually meet basic needs like public health facilities, campgrounds, carparks, etc.

If you've got the power, why give it up? A little First Amendment is activity is fine, but not if it means you'll actually have to live next to poor people and deal with that daily reality.

The basic denial of fundamental human needs is justified by ranting on about "messy camping" "noise complaints" "rude behavior" instead of addressing the realities of no public toilet facilities, a background of regular institutional police abuse, and token poverty pimpery that provides cover for liberals.

It's quite revealing how peaceful but determined protest can reveal the abuses of authority and the willingness of middle-class liberals to utterly deny the basic needs of poor people in order to maintain a serene scene in their own neighborhoods.

Of course, as Frederick Douglass and Martin Luther King knew, you don't get real change without thunder and lightening when class privilege is so deeply entrenched.

At least at Arcata City Council, most folks give their names. I guess "fearful" is too fearful to give his. Not the best credential for credibility.
by Robert Norse
Wednesday May 9th, 2007 9:20 AM
Encampment activists, supporters, and critics are invited to call my radio show Sunday May 13th at 831-460-3119 between 9:30 AM and 1 PM. The show streams at http://www.freakradio.org and is archived at http://www.huffsantacruz.org. We also broadcast locally at 101.1 FM.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

Donate Now!

$ 117.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network